Correspondent Banking: Cross-Border Risks Explained

What Is Correspondent Banking?

Correspondent banking refers to the arrangement between two financial institutions that allows international transactions and services on behalf of one another. A "correspondent bank" operates in one country to provide services for a "respondent bank" located in another. This system forms the backbone of cross-border finance, enabling trade, remittances, and investment globally.

For example, a respondent bank in Southeast Asia may lack the infrastructure to execute international transactions in US dollars. It collaborates with a correspondent bank in the United States to handle these processes. Services can include fund transfers, international payment settlements, and currency exchanges.

Difference between Correspondent and Respondent Banks

While correspondent banks offer cross-border transaction services, respondent banks are typically smaller institutions relying on their correspondent partners for such capabilities. This symbiotic relationship exemplifies how institutions with limited global access leverage infrastructure to tap into global markets.

How Correspondent Banking Works

At its core, a correspondent banking arrangement is a contractual relationship aimed at executing transactions and providing banking services.

  1. Establishing a Relationship:

    The banks create an agreement specifying services, transaction fees, and compliance protocols.

  2. Transaction Process Flow:

    When an individual or entity needs to transfer funds internationally, the request is routed through the respondent bank to the correspondent bank, which facilitates final processing.

  3. Example in International Trade:

    Imagine a French exporter sells goods to a firm in Canada. The Canadian respondent bank utilises its relationship with a major EU correspondent bank to convert CAD to euros, ensuring seamless payment.

Risks in Correspondent Banking

The scale and complexity of correspondent banking introduce unique challenges, particularly in handling financial crime risks:

Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

These systems are sometimes exploited for layering illicit funds or terrorist financing. Criminal groups conceal the true origin of funds by transferring money across borders.

Nested Correspondent Banking

This occurs when smaller, second-tier banks access correspondent services through another respondent bank. While this extends access, it can obscure the identity of the originating bank and increase compliance risks.

Jurisdiction Risks

Banks operating in high-risk countries with weak anti-money laundering (AML) frameworks may lack the regulatory mechanisms to prevent financial crimes. Enhanced due diligence (EDD) tools can mitigate these risks.

How LSEG Helps:

Through its World-Check solution, LSEG supports financial institutions by providing enriched due diligence screening. These reports uncover hidden risks in supply chains or third-party relationships, offering real-time transaction monitoring.

AML and Due Diligence in Correspondent Banking

Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

Compliance frameworks demand financial institutions conduct customer verification processes, including Know Your Customer (KYC). Respondent banks are required to verify their customers’ identities before routing transactions through a correspondent.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

High-risk respondent institutions require advanced scrutiny. FATF guidelines recommend in-depth financial risk assessments and regular transaction reporting.

Global AML Guidance

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and regional directives, like the EU's AMLD, have increasingly influenced compliance strategies. LSEG Risk Intelligence collaborates with institutions to implement robust AML screening by identifying politically exposed persons and monitoring sanction risks.

De-Risking in Correspondent Banking

Why Banks De-risk

Compliance costs for maintaining high-risk correspondent relationships sometimes outweigh economic benefits. As a result, banks "de-risk" by severing ties with entities in jurisdictions seen as non-compliant with AML standards.

Impact on Global Trade

This trend has reduced access to financial services in emerging economies, particularly affecting trade and remittance services.

Balancing Risk and Inclusion

LSEG World-Check supports informed de-risking by offering negative media checks and transaction screening, allowing banks to focus on risk-aware expansions rather than blanket account closures.

Regulatory Oversight

FATF Recommendations

Highlighted as the global benchmark for correspondent banking, FATF outlines measures for monitoring and reporting suspicious activities.

US and EU Standards

Laws like the US PATRIOT Act and EU's AMLD establish stricter rules for managing cross-border banking relationships. Furthermore, UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) plays a pivotal role in mandating transparency.

Global Guidance

Regional regulators, including Hong Kong’s Monetary Authority and Singapore's MAS, enforce comprehensive compliance mechanisms.

Technology and Monitoring Advancements

Data Transparency

Modern correspondent banking integrates AI tools for improved risk-based transaction monitoring. Solutions like LSEG World-Check incorporate machine learning to reduce false positives and uncover hidden risks in massive datasets.

Cross-border Payments Evolution

Technology plays a powerful role in enabling real-time validation for cross-border payments. LSEG's holistic capabilities include negative media screening for enhanced visibility.

Challenges and Future Outlook

Rising Compliance Costs

Correspondent banking participants face mounting pressure to comply with overlapping jurisdictional rules.

Data Sharing

Despite efforts by global institutions to promote standardisation, inconsistent policies between jurisdictions remain a challenge in correspondent banking.

Blockchain Disruption

Blockchain offers an alternative to the traditional correspondent banking network. While adoption has yet to achieve mainstream audiences, the technology promises greater transparency.

FAQs

  • Correspondent banking is a banking arrangement where one financial institution provides services to another, typically for cross-border transactions. This structure enables respondent banks to access international banking networks and services like payment processing and currency exchange, even if they lack the infrastructure themselves.

  • Correspondent banking involves a contractual relationship where a correspondent bank provides transaction services for a respondent bank. For example, if a local bank needs to process a dollar-denominated transaction, it will use its correspondent bank to execute the transfer abroad. These processes facilitate global financial connectivity.

  • A correspondent banking relationship is the formal partnership between two financial institutions, where one acts as the intermediary for handling services such as international payments, fund transfers, and trade finance. This partnership operates under an agreement detailing the scope of services and compliance requirements.

  • Correspondent banking supports the global economy by enabling cross-border transactions essential for trade, remittances, and investment flows. Without it, financial institutions in emerging economies would struggle to access global markets due to limited foreign banking infrastructure.

  • Key services include international fund transfers, foreign exchange transactions, cheque clearing, payment settlement, and trade finance facilitation. These services streamline cross-border financial operations, fostering global business and investment.

  • Nested correspondent banking occurs when a respondent bank accesses services indirectly through another correspondent relationship. It increases service accessibility but can also create additional layers of complexity, which may obscure the ownership or origin of transactions, increasing compliance risks.

  • The large transaction volumes and cross-border nature of correspondent banking expose it to risks such as money laundering, terrorist financing, and regulatory non-compliance. Additionally, nested relationships and dealings with banks in high-risk jurisdictions amplify these challenges.

  • In the context of anti-money laundering (AML), correspondent banking refers to the application of risk-based oversight to ensure transactions are not used for illicit activities. Robust AML frameworks require correspondent banks to perform due diligence on respondent banks and monitor transactions for suspicious behaviour.

  • Common AML red flags include unusually large or frequent transactions, transfers involving high-risk or sanctioned jurisdictions, sudden changes in transaction behaviour, and opaque ownership structures of respondent banks. Effective monitoring systems help identify and mitigate these risks.

  • Correspondent banking due diligence involves assessing the risk profiles of respondent banks, including their corporate structure, location, ownership, and AML policies. Enhanced due diligence may be applied for high-risk relationships, involving deeper verification and continuous transaction monitoring.

  • De-risking refers to the practice of correspondent banks terminating relationships with respondent banks deemed too risky to manage. This often occurs due to regulatory pressure, high compliance costs, or concerns over engagements with high-risk jurisdictions or sectors.

  • The primary risks in correspondent banking include money laundering, terrorism financing, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. Nested banking relationships and transactions with entities in weakly regulated jurisdictions further amplify these risks.

  • An example is a Kenyan bank that lacks infrastructure for international payments relying on a European correspondent bank to process USD-denominated transactions for its clients. This arrangement enables seamless cross-border trade and remittance payments.

  • Regulators enforce AML and compliance standards through frameworks provided by institutions like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and regional laws such as the EU AML Directives. These frameworks mandate monitoring, reporting suspicious activities, and conducting regular due diligence on banking relationships.

  • Technology is transforming risk management by introducing AI-driven transaction monitoring, data-sharing platforms, and machine-learning models that enhance compliance efficiency. These advancements enable banks to detect fraud, sanctions violations, and other anomalies in real-time, mitigating correspondent banking risks effectively.

Request details

Help & Support

Already a customer?

Get help through MyAccount
external

Office locations

Contact LSEG near you

Find your nearest LSEG office