Jaakko Kooroshy
Kieran Brophy
Sentiment around COP30 in Belém has been decidedly downbeat. As delegations return from the Brazilian rainforest, the outcome of the latest round of climate negotiations been mostly interpreted as hard-fought, if uninspiring, compromise.
In reality, the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) must decidedly count as one of the ‘good ones’ since the agreement was first signed in Rio in 1992.
2025 was always set to be a pivotal juncture for global climate talks. When countries gathered in 2015 in Paris for COP21, 2025 was earmarked as the year for countries to submit new, more ambitious emissions-reduction pledges for the period beyond 2030.
These NDCs are what matters most to markets – and to climate change. At LSEG, we have been tracking NDCs closely as the clearest signal yet on the actual emissions pathway policy makers are envisaging for their countries post-2030. They shape the transition risk environment for investors and companies and, ultimately, in aggregate will also define global emission trajectories, making them key to gauging future physical risk.
Yet the year was off to a challenging start for the NDCs. In January, the US, the world’s second largest emitter and world’s largest economy, signalled it would withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In February, 95% of signatories missed the deadline to submit their new targets; by the end of August this still stood at 85%. In other words, just three months before COP30, the NDC process was teetering on the brink of failure.
However, a late rally in the eight weeks before COP30 shifted the picture – a fact that perplexingly seems to have been lost on journalists and delegates alike. Two thirds of countries had announced or formally submitted their new 2035 targets. Once – as expected – India announces its new NDC before the end of the year, three quarters of global emissions will be covered by the new 2035 targets, with only two G20 countries lacking concrete new targets.
Our data shows that these new emission reduction commitments are substantive. China, the world’s largest emitter, has pledged absolute economy-wide emission reductions for the first time – an anathema for Beijing in previous negotiations rounds. Other key emerging economies have also committed to peaking emissions and absolute reductions – including Indonesia, Turkey, Brazil and Mexico – signalling that development and decarbonisation can go hand in hand.
Several advanced economies, too, have set material new targets. After eleventh-hour negotiations, the EU agreed its NDC days before COP in the form of a legally binding commitment. This will require the bloc to half its emissions in the space of 10 years – and then to half them again in the 5 years thereafter. The UK’s target is even more ambitious, while Japan, South Korea, and Australia too have made significant new commitments. This will have momentous consequences for industry, as meeting these new targets will require tackling emissions in so-called hard to abate sectors in earnest for the first time.
Cynics may argue that these are just empty promises, but the track record suggests otherwise. In 2015, the EU originally set a 40% reduction target for 2030, before increasing it to 55% in 2020. The EU’s latest projections show the bloc’s trajectory is off this goal by a whisker, at 54% emissions reduction. China too, has consistently outperformed its own climate targets, and the G20 are in aggregate not far off hitting their goals (for a detailed analysis, see the LSEG COP30 Net Zero Atlas).
In aggregate, these new national targets point to significant acceleration in emissions reductions beyond 2030. We estimate that across the 17 G20 countries with announced targets, they imply emission reductions of 2.5-3.4% per year from 2030-2035, compared to 0.5-0.7% for the same countries for 2023-30. This is not enough to put the world on track for goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well-below 2°C, but it is material progress and, for investors, signals that transition risk will accelerate in many key markets.
Focusing narrowly on the dynamics of the COP30 summit distracts from the fact that the Paris Agreement just passed a critical stress test – with broad-ranging implications for key sectors, from the growth of the green economy to companies’ transition plans. COP30 demonstrates that the NDC process at the core of the agreement continues to deliver real progress – and can do so even in an age of political fragmentation and geopolitical turbulence.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2025 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.