Mandy Chiang
Belle Chang
Over the past five years, yields in emerging Asian bond markets have followed the US interest rate cycle but with smaller absolute movements, reflecting controlled inflation and a more cautious monetary stance than in other emerging countries. However, the region’s bond markets continue to throw up opportunities.
In this article, we review recent developments in six key emerging Asian bond markets—China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand—and explore how differences in yields, policy cycles and currencies have shaped and are shaping returns, particularly from the perspective of US dollar-based investors.
Post-pandemic policy paths diverge
Mirroring the US Federal Reserve, most emerging Asian central banks tightened policy during the post-pandemic period and started to ease by mid-2024 (Chart 1). Despite less aggressive absolute policy changes over the period than in the US, India’s, the Philippines’ and Indonesia’s policy rates still sat above US yields in September 2025, while rates in China, Malaysia and Thailand moved from a premium to US rates to a discount over the five-year period (Chart 2).
These differentials continue to influence portfolio allocations and cross-border capital flows, especially for investors seeking real yield and diversification. In this article, we examine the macroeconomic factors driving emerging Asian bond market returns (with the exception of China: although we show Chinese economic and market statistics in the charts, we do not comment on them, since China’s interest rate cycle and the country’s stimulus approach have been covered extensively by FTSE Russell elsewhere).
Chart 1: Changes in policy interest rates 2020-25 (US and Emerging Asia)
Chart 2: Policy rate differentials (US vs. Emerging Asia)
In Chart 3, we summarise the year-to-date policy rate movements and headline inflation rates for the six emerging Asian markets we cover in this article (as at the end of September 2025). Inflation declined steadily in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines as energy and food prices stabilised. India’s inflation has also remained within its 2–6 percent target range. China’s readings have stayed low, reflecting subdued domestic demand. Inflation remains controlled in the region, while, based on a comparison of policy rates with the latest inflation readings, India and Philippines appear to be the two economies that have further room for monetary easing.
Chart 3: September 2025 policy rate and inflation table
India |
Philippines |
Indonesia |
China |
Malaysia |
Thailand |
|
Current Policy Rate (%) |
5.5 |
5 |
4.75 |
3 |
2.75 |
1.5 |
Year-to-Date Change (%) |
-1 |
-0.75 |
-1.25 |
-0.1 |
-0.25 |
-0.75 |
Year-to-Date number of changes |
3 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Latest YoY Inflation Rate (CB target rate) |
1.54 (2.00-6.00) |
1.70 (3.00) |
2.65 (2.50) |
-0.30 (2.00) |
1.30 (-) |
-0.72 (2.00) |
Source: LSEG Workspace,data as of 30/9/2025. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
According to the IMF, the economic outlook for the region remains positive, with regional growth forecasts upgraded twice so far in 2025 (Chart 4).
India, with a 6.6 percent projected growth rate in 2025, is the fastest-expanding economy in the group, supported by investment and consumption. Indonesia and the Philippines remain mid-range performers, while Malaysia and Thailand have returned to pre-pandemic growth rates amid recovering exports and tourism. China’s growth has moderated but remains steady, driven by infrastructure spending and selective policy easing.
Chart 4: IMF upgrades its emerging Asian growth forecasts
| Latest GDP Growth Forecast (October 2025) | Change in Forecast since April 2025 | |||
Country |
2025 |
2026 |
2025 |
2026 |
India |
6.6 |
6.2 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
Philippines |
5.4 |
5.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Indonesia |
4.9 |
4.9 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
China |
4.8 |
4.2 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
Malaysia |
4.5 |
4.0 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
Thailand |
2.0 |
1.6 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook, October 2025. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Taken together, these trends show that by 2025 most economies in the region had achieved a balance between price stability and moderate growth — a stark contrast to the volatility that defined the 2020-2022 period.
Emerging Asian sovereign bond markets: returns and risk
The 7-10-year sovereign bond yield spreads of emerging Asian markets over US Treasuries have gradually narrowed post-pandemic. India, Indonesia and the Philippines continue to offer yield premia, reflecting higher perceived risk (Chart 5). The rest of the markets in the region did not follow the US interest rate cycle as aggressively: Malaysia has seen a less volatile yield spread over the period, eventually reaching a negative spread to US Treasuries in Q4 2023. Thailand and China moved to a negative spread a year earlier, reflecting lower peak interest rates in Thailand than in the US and a gradual decline in Chinese rates over the 5-year period.
Chart 5: 7-10 year sovereign bond yield spread over US treasuries
In Chart 6, we show the historical cumulative returns and volatility of emerging Asian government bonds, measured in unhedged US dollar terms, from January 2022 to September 2025.
Over this period, Malaysian and Thai government bonds delivered outstanding US dollar returns when compared to regional and global emerging market peers, largely due to these markets’ relatively stable currencies. India, Indonesia and the Philippines, which are perceived as higher-yielding markets, experienced a weaker currency performance over the period, eroding much of the return when measured in US dollar terms.
Chart 6: Returns and risk of emerging Asian government bonds (2022-2025)
Summary Metric |
US |
China |
India |
Thailand |
Malaysia |
Philippines |
Indonesia |
EM Asia (20% capped) |
EM Global (20% capped) |
DM excl. US (20% capped) |
Total Return (USD) |
-3.39% |
4.04% |
6.93% |
16.10% |
16.55% |
2.11% |
10.42% |
10.88% |
14.32% |
-15.74% |
Annualised return |
-0.92% |
1.06% |
1.80% |
4.06% |
4.17% |
0.56% |
2.68% |
2.79% |
3.63% |
-4.46% |
Annualised Volatility |
6.20% |
5.11% |
5.18% |
12.80% |
11.32% |
10.56% |
9.11% |
8.88% |
8.82% |
12.26% |
Sharpe Ratio |
-0.15 |
0.21 |
0.35 |
0.32 |
0.37 |
0.05 |
0.29 |
0.31 |
0.41 |
-0.36 |
Source: FTSE Russell, data from 31/1/2022-30/9/2025. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
For external investors in emerging Asian bond markets, currency risk remains a critical topic, as 2025 has demonstrated (Chart 7). In the year to date, the Thai baht (THB), Malaysian ringgit (MYR) and Chinese yuan (CNY) have strengthened against the US dollar, while the Indian rupee (INR), Indonesian rupiah (IDR) and Philippine peso (PHP) have weakened. Below, we examine these currency movements in more detail.
Chart 7: Currency effect on unhedged returns of emerging Asian government bonds
China |
India |
Thailand |
Malaysia |
Philippines |
Indonesia |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year-to-Date Return (USD) |
2.66 |
2.07 |
12.04 |
11.65 |
4.74 |
6 |
Year-to-Date Return (LCY) |
0.12 |
5.87 |
6.49 |
5.08 |
5.39 |
9.75 |
Year-to-Date Return (FX) |
2.54 |
-3.59 |
5.21 |
6.25 |
-0.62 |
-3.42 |
Source: FTSE Russell, data from 31/12/2024-30/9/2025. Past performance is not a guide t
Source: FTSE Russell, data from 31/12/2024-30/9/2025. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
For investors holding Asian local currency bonds, one current attraction is real yield. As seen in Chart 8, emerging Asian markets ranked the highest against developed Asian markets (such as Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong and Japan) and other developed markets (such as US, UK and Australia) in real yield terms. In summary, the relatively high inflation rates in major developed markets are making Asian local currency bonds more appealing.
Chart 8: Emerging Asia’s real yield advantage
Emerging Asian currency movements
Above, we looked at the year-to-date divergence in the performance of emerging Asian currencies against the US dollar. However, over the past five years, most emerging Asian currencies have depreciated against the dollar, particularly during the period encompassing the Federal Reserve’s sharp interest rises (in 2022—Chart 9).
The Philippine peso (PHP), Indian rupee (INR) and Indonesian rupiah (IDR) were the major underperformers over five years: indeed, Indonesia and Philippines have delivered the most rate cuts among emerging Asian markets since June 2024.
In addition, foreign portfolio outflows and domestic political uncertainties in both countries have weighed on their respective currencies. The Malaysian ringgit (MYR) outperformed its regional peers and performed almost in line with the US dollar over five years, reflecting Malaysia’s relatively resilient growth. Since mid-2024, Malaysia’s central bank has only delivered a 25 basis point, pre-emptive rate cut at its July 2025 meeting, citing this as a precaution against global trade uncertainty and marking one of the shallowest interest rate cycles in Asia.
Chart 9: Year-to-date and 5-year performance of emerging Asian currencies
The Indian rupee depreciated against the US dollar by 20.3% over 5 years and 3.7% in the year to date, lagging other emerging Asian currencies. In Chart 10, we show that foreign investors have been net sellers of Indian equities since Q3 2024, reportedly reacting to high perceived valuations, and this has coincided with weakness in the rupee.
However, net foreign purchases of Indian government bonds have remained stable since early 2024, despite the relative weakness of the rupee. This may reflect the growing openness of India’s domestic bond market to outside investors: as a result of improvements in the market accessibility level of India, FTSE Russell announced in October 2024 that it would be including Indian government bonds in the FTSE Emerging Markets Government Bond index with effect from September 2025.
More recently, a slowdown in India’s growth outlook, driven by slower infrastructure spending, and uncertainty regarding US trade policy has further weighed on the Indian currency. Recent geopolitical developments continue to put downwards pressure on the rupee: external headwinds, including tariff uncertainties and the US’s more restrictive new H-1B visa policies, have weighed further on market sentiment, leading to three consecutive months of foreign equity outflows from July to September 2025.
Chart 10: Non-resident equity investors have driven weakness in India’s rupee
Corporate credit risks and opportunities
Over the past five years, Asia’s US dollar credit markets have transitioned from an extended period of low yields to a higher-yield environment. When compared to US investment grade (IG) credit, the Asian US dollar IG credit yield premium no longer exists, meaning there’s no additional risk compensation for investors in investment grade Asian US dollar bonds (Chart 11).
Chart 11: Yield spreads vs 7-10 US Treasury bonds—Asian and US corporates, Asian Agency bonds and Asian local currency government bonds
However, an increasing number of investors are now turning to the Asian local currency bond markets. In Chart 12, we summarise the risk-return characteristics of different categories of Asian bonds during the five years to September 2025, with the returns and volatility of US Treasuries and investment grade US dollar bonds shown for comparison.
Among the categories, emerging Asian local currency government bonds delivered the highest total return over the period, outperforming both regional credit sectors and US dollar-denominated bonds, despite US dollar appreciation during the same period.
Asian emerging market US dollar agency bonds ranked second in return terms after local currency bonds. Overall, these two categories provided the most resilient and consistent outcomes among Asian fixed income categories over the period.
Chart 12: Historical return and volatility comparison (USD)
| LCY | USD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Summary Metric (Since 202010) |
Asian EM LCY Govt. (20% capped) |
Asian EM LCY Govt. ex China (20% capped) |
ALBBI* Corporate (20% capped) |
ALBBI* Agency (20% capped) |
EM Asian USD Sovereign |
EM Asian USD Agency |
EM Asian USD Corporate |
UST |
US Corp IG |
Total Return (USD) |
12.73% |
10.35% |
9.44% |
8.23% |
5.30% |
11.13% |
5.37% |
-5.50% |
2.46% |
Annualised return |
2.46% |
2.02% |
1.85% |
1.62% |
1.06% |
2.17% |
1.07% |
-1.14% |
0.50% |
Annualised Volatility |
7.00% |
8.11% |
6.10% |
6.41% |
9.10% |
6.15% |
6.03% |
5.63% |
7.85% |
Sharpe Ratio |
0.35 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
0.12 |
0.35 |
0.18 |
-0.20 |
0.06 |
Highest Monthly Return |
4.89% |
6.04% |
4.35% |
4.59% |
7.38% |
4.82% |
6.00% |
3.44% |
5.95% |
Lowest Monthly Return |
-4.45% |
-5.19% |
-4.46% |
-4.74% |
-8.83% |
-5.09% |
-3.94% |
-3.42% |
-5.32% |
Max Drawdown |
-14.06% |
-18.31% |
-14.24% |
-16.57% |
-24.18% |
-14.94% |
-21.51% |
-16.92% |
-20.36% |
Source: FTSE Russell, LSEG, data from 30/9/2020-30/9/2025. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.*ALBBI stands for FTSE Asian Local-currency Broad Bond Index Series. As of 20250930, the series includes China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines.
One of the characteristics of Asian corporate and agency bond markets is their relatively shorter duration. In Chart 13, we compare the yield pick-up per unit of duration across Emerging Asia and the US bond markets as of October 2025.
At that date, Asian US dollar investment-grade corporates offered over 150 basis points of yield per unit of duration more than their US peers. Among sovereign issuers, Indian government bonds offered over 250 basis points of yield per unit of duration relative to their regional peers. Overall, Asian credit markets currently offer higher yield compensation relative to their duration risk.
Chart 13: Yield spread per unit of duration
Conclusion
During the past five years, a period that encompasses the fall-out from the Covid-19 pandemic, interest rates around the world have risen sharply and then retreated in response to a surge in inflation and its subsequent moderation.
While emerging Asian bond markets have reflected this rate cycle, their movements in yield have generally been smaller than in the US and individual paths have diverged. Higher-yielding markets, such as India, Indonesia and the Philippines, still pay a yield premium over US bonds, reflecting local economic challenges and perceived currency risks. The relatively lower-yielding markets of Malaysia and Thailand have shown stronger local currencies over the same period, helping offset yield differences.
Overall, most emerging Asian economies have managed to control inflation and maintain a more cautious monetary stance than other emerging countries. With projected growth rates higher in Asia than in the rest of the world and despite uncertainty over tariffs and trade, the outlook remains favourable.
For investors, Asian bonds still present opportunities, including higher yields, shorter average durations, lower inflation, room for further easing and for currency appreciation. Within an emerging market fixed income portfolio, Asian bonds can therefore serve as a means for additional return and for currency diversification.
Disclaimer
© 2025 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.