Ryan Giannotto, CFA
- Reduced Drawdowns: The Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index cut peak drawdown by 29% versus the benchmark during April’s tariff volatility.
- Superior Risk Efficiency: Multifactor allocation reduced peak volatility by 13.8 percentage points, outperforming both equal-weighted and market-cap weighted strategies.
- Factor-Driven Stock Selection: Companies with strong factor scores like BJ’s Wholesale were significantly overweighted, while poor scorers like Tesla and Boeing were excluded or underweighted.
In a year of equity market volatility, factors have provided an oasis of relative stability. After a secular rise in equity prices in 2023 and 2024, extended valuations and high concentration laid the groundwork for factors to stabilise market excesses. The results thus far in 2025 have been attenuated downdraws without sacrifice of long-term growth potential.
The Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index operates with an even tilt to each of the “big five” factors (Quality, Value, Momentum, Low Volatility and (small) Size). In this insight, we show how targeting these independent drivers of return reduced total drawdown by 29% versus the benchmark. We also give three examples of how a multifactor approach informs index constituent weightings.
Factors rethink vol exposure
Raw performance lends an excellent case study for how factors can diversify equity returns away from an index with a concentrated “Magnificent 7” risk profile. Whereas the Russell 1000 Index has experienced a peak drawdown of 19.15% so far this year, the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index dampened the blow to a pullback of only 13.70%. The peak outperformance of the factor index was achieved on April 4th at a walloping 614 basis points, a large contributor to which was the downweighting of the Mag 7 names by 29 points at the start of 2025.
Factor Outperformance 2025
Source: FTSE Russell Data, May 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
In the context of risk efficiency, the factor-driven narrative becomes even more compelling. The figure below depicts the rolling 15-day annualized risk thus far in 2025 for the Comprehensive Factor Index and other mainline equity exposures in the large cap ecosystem. It’s striking that the factor index was both the best-performing and least volatile of the indices highlighted, downgrading what was a period of extreme distress for many investors to mere discomfort.
Rolling 15-Day Volatilities
Source: FTSE Russell Data, May 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Measured by 15-day rolling historic volatility, the Comprehensive Factor Index reduced peak risk by 13.8 percentage points versus the Russell 1000 benchmark. Moreover, allocating equally to factors achieved 3.5 times the volatility reduction when compared with allocating equally to stocks, In other words, factors can offer a more informed way to diversify equity risk than equal-weighted strategies. Indeed, so effective were factors at softening the April 2025 tariff shock that peak volatility for the factor index was only marginally higher than the average volatility for Mag 7 names (45.3% versus 42.1%--see the bar chart below).
2025 Volatility Comparison by Index
Source: FTSE Russell Data, data period 12/31/24- 4/30/24. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Method to the (lack of) madness
Performance characteristics aside, how does a multifactor strategy determine its stock selection? The Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index looks for companies that exhibit all five factor exposures simultaneously, identifying them as key model overweights for a semi-annual rebalance.
The key advantage of this approach is that instead of making bets in five different directions—which tend to wash out and self-neutralise—the model finds instances where these factors are already in alignment. In effect, the percentile rank of exposure to each of the five factors is a direct multiplier to market cap weighting. Companies with higher scores receive a higher multiplier, while companies with lower scores see reduced allocations.
To break through the abstraction, three examples bring the operation of this Index to life. First we show why a well-knownr Magnificent 7 company (Tesla) was eliminated from the factor index; second, we explain why a consumer staples company (BJ’s Wholesale Club) received one of the model’s highest overweights; and third, we show why aerospace giant Boeing was nearly excluded due to its poor factor scores.
- Tesla Motors (TSLA): Though it’s a high-profile stock, the leading electric automotive manufacturer is a prime instance of a Mag 7 company that was eliminated from the multifactor portfolio because of its low compound factor score: Tesla is the 17th worst scoring company in the entire Russell 1000 benchmark. This is primarily due to the company’s Low Volatility and Size factor scores (which are in the bottom 2nd and 1st percentiles, respectively). However, with Tesla’s stock price down 30.1% year-to-date (as at the end of April), the company’s Momentum and Value scores (which are in the bottom quartile and quintile, respectively) had an additional negative impact on its ranking.
- BJ’s Wholesale Club (BJ): At around $15 billion in market capitalisation, this consumer staples company is overweighted 18 times by the Comprehensive Factor methodology. As the 13th highest scoring company overall, it achieves an 82nd percentile rank in Quality and 77th percentile rank in Value. Driven by consumers looking to extend their purchasing power, the stock is up 31.6% year-to-date (at the end of April) and its Momentum score also lies half a standard deviation above the mean.
- Boeing (BA): The embattled aerospace giant sees its benchmark weight reduced by 99% in the multifactor model after it was ranked in the bottom 4% overall. Boeing’s highest factor exposure is a 35th percentile score for Quality, but it performs worse on other factors, reducing its overall score. For instance, the company scores half a standard deviation below the mean in Value, 0.9 standard deviations below the mean on Volatility and it is in the bottom 2% for Momentum. Combined, these metrics are an example of a multi-factor index removing a company with poor exposure to the fundamental drivers of return.
Systematic, data driven
These case example companies help vivify what high and low factor scoring companies look like during a period of elevated market stress. By taking a systematic approach to these historical drivers of excess return, the Comprehensive Factor Index delivered marked improvements to performance and risk efficiency.
[1] Determined by Z-Score and configured to percentile rank by the gaussian error function.
Read more about
Disclaimer
© 2025 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.
