Tom Roseen
Over the last few months, investors have had to contend with greater market uncertainty given the news about failing regional banks, rising interest rates, inflationary worries, and now rising concerns about protracted debt-ceiling negotiations—and a possible fiscal crisis, caused by a potential default.
Both sides of the political aisle appear to be digging in their heels over the debt-ceiling issue. House Republicans recently approved a bill that would raise the debt ceiling while slashing federal spending and rolling back a range of Democratic policies to the consternation of House and Senate Democrats who contend that Congress should raise the debt limit without spending cuts or other conditions.
The current U.S. debt ceiling of $31.4 trillion was already reached on January 19, 2023, but the markets initially ignored that news, focusing on more imminent issues (rising inflation, interest rate hikes, bank failures, and the like) because most analysts believed that the Treasury still had the means of funding the operations of the federal government until at least September. However, on May 1 Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned in a letter to Congressional leaders that a U.S. default could occur as soon as June 1 if Congress doesn’t raise the nation’s borrowing limits.
And while most pundits believe there is a very small likelihood of the U.S. actually defaulting on its debt, we have recently seen an unusual rise in the three-month T-Bill yield maturing in late-June to mid-July. So now the asset considered by global markets to be the standard risk-free rate is suddenly being impacted by credit risk because of the uncertainty of those negotiations and the Treasury’s possible inability to service the government’s obligations in a timely manner.
Historical Yield Curve
For the Refinitiv Lipper fund-flows week ended Wednesday, May 3, mutual fund and ETF investors were net purchasers of fund assets, injecting a net $5.8 billion. However, the headlines don’t tell the complete story. Investors were net purchasers of short-term assets, padding the coffers of money market funds (+$21.5 billion) while being net redeemers of equity funds (-$14.0 billion), taxable bond funds (-$930 million), and tax-exempt fixed income funds (-$846 million) for the week.
Given the rise in regional bank concerns and the remote threat of a possible default by the U.S. government, it wasn’t too surprising to see money market funds (+$21.5 billion) witness their second consecutive weekly net inflows. U.S. Government Money Market Funds (+$8.2 billion) took in the largest draw of net new money for the week, followed by Money Market Instrument Funds (+$4.8 billion), U.S. Treasury Money Market Funds (+$3.5 billion), Institutional U.S. Treasury Money Market Funds (+$3.5 billion), and Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Funds (+$606 million), while Institutional Money Market Funds (-$1.4 billion) suffered the only net redemption. Year to date, the money market funds macro-group has attracted $414.7 billion.
However, despite the concerns of a U.S. default and the Federal Reserve Board’s 25-basis-point interest rate hike on May 3, investors continued to inject net new money into government-Treasury funds and ETFs for the week, but with the group attracting just $114 million this past week.
Weekly Estimated Net Flows ($MiI) and Returns (%) Government-Treasury Mutual Fund & ETF Macro-Group
Nonetheless, year to date, the government-Treasury macro-group has attracted the largest amount of net new money of any of Lipper’s taxable bond fund macro-groups—taking in some $34.5 billion as investors continue to look for safety, followed closely by the corporate investment-grade debt funds (and ETFs) macro-group (+$20.2 billion).
Year-to-Date Estimated Net Flows ($BiI) Taxable Bond Fund & ETF Macro-Groups Through the FundFlows Week Ended May 3, 2023
Drilling down to Lipper U.S. mutual fund and ETF taxable fixed income classifications for the most recent fund-flows week, Core Bond Funds (+$2.8 billion), Absolute Return Bond Funds (+$448 million), and Core Plus Bond Funds (+$229 million) took in the largest amount of net new money, while High Yield Bond Funds (-$1.5 billion) and Corporate Debt BBB-Rated Funds (-$1.2 billion) experienced the largest outflows. However, some government and Treasury classifications managed to attract minor net inflows for the week, with Short U.S. Treasury Funds (and ETFs) attracting the largest draw (+$294 million) of those classifications.
Estimated Net Flows ($Mil) Treasury and Government Fund & ETF Classifications for the Week Ended May 3, 2023
For the flows week, SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL, +$235 million) took in the largest sum of net new money in the government-Treasury funds (and ETFs) macro-group, followed by iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT, +$189 million), iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT, +$118 million), and GMO US Treasury Fund (GUSTX, +$115 million). Meanwhile, iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF, -$410 million) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY, -$123 million) handed back the largest individual net redemptions for the week.
As we have pointed out before, there is still a large dichotomy between ETF and mutual fund flows—even in the government-Treasury funds macro-classification, with the former attracting some $32.2 billion year to date, while the latter took in just $2.3 billion.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.