As negotiators start to prepare for the 28th UN Climate Change Conference (COP28), the stakes are high. Why? Because the meeting that starts in November will conclude the global stocktake intended to assess countries’ collective progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global temperature rises to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels by 2050.
- The meeting will conclude the global stocktake of countries’ collective progress towards the Paris Agreement’s goals. But there’s no agreed course of action for what happens if, as expected, countries are revealed to be falling behind.
- Last year’s COP meeting in Egypt showed how fragile the process is, despite agreement on “loss and damage” for vulnerable countries, and accelerating progress in the development of climate finance.
- Preparations for Dubai’s high-stakes COP28 are already underway, with phasing down oil and gas use likely to be high on the agenda.
No one expects the assessment that started two years ago at Glasgow’s COP26 to conclude that the globe is on track. Many countries’ national climate change plans, or Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), are already known to fall short of what’s needed.
But the key question is: what will then be done to keep Paris alive? There’s no agreed course of action for what happens next. Negotiators will have to find a way forward before the conference convenes in just nine short months from now.
“A few advanced economies are tracking towards below two degrees with very ambitious commitments, although there’s still a question mark over whether they’ll hit those commitments,” notes Jaakko Kooroshy, London Stock Exchange Group’s (LSEG) Global Head of Sustainable Investment Research.
“And some large emerging economies such as India have very low emissions today and are aligned to well below two degrees, although their emissions are growing fast. But many other economies are aligning to above three degrees; in some cases, closer to four degrees. Countries like Australia or Canada – and that’s where we need new commitments.”
The FTSE Russell 2022 Net Zero Atlas warned that national climate reduction policies on aggregate were still falling short of the scale and pace needed. While countries’ current climate policies are gradually aligning with their 2030 commitments, they still imply a 2.8°C level of warming on average, well below the ambition needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Progress at COP27
For evidence of the fragility of climate change negotiations, look no further than COP27. With many negotiators voicing frustration that the conference did not go further to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the meeting did at least achieve a historic agreement to provide “loss and damage” funding for vulnerable countries hit hard by climate disasters, similar to that recently pledged to Pakistan.
Yet this also creates a risk of future loss of faith in negotiations if developed countries do not keep their commitments.
Another bright spot is the development of climate finance tools, which continues regardless.
“There’s a lot of interesting work going on and a feeling of acceleration,” asserts Tessa Walsh, ESG Financing Editor at IFR. “Looking at loss and damage, it’s all about adaptation. How do we help companies brace against the worst incoming effects of climate change?
“With adaptation finances traditionally being the preserve of governments, the key issue is how to get private sector capital into adaptation. So, how do we get that money where it needs to go, which is often into the riskier parts of the world that are facing more extreme conditions?”
Energy transition key topic at COP28
Preparation is underway in earnest for UAE’s COP28 – where the topic of the energy transition is certain to be on the agenda, in what is the geographical centre of the world’s hydrocarbon industry.
Many countries are currently working out how to tell the story of their energy transition plans and attract the funding to fulfil them, with Middle Eastern countries’ plans, especially controversial.
“There’s a lot of scepticism about fossil fuel-dependent economies and how they’re going to tackle a transition,” notes Walsh. “Are they going do it in good faith or not? The whole debate about greenwashing has probably been chilling to some of those countries. But the fact of the matter is, we need them on board if we are going to transition and we have to figure out an acceptable way to still keep them engaged with the process positively.”
Carbon reduction goals
Broadly speaking, there is some room for optimism about global progress towards the Paris goals. While some developed economies do not have sufficiently ambitious policies for 2030, they have more impressive carbon reduction ambitions for 2050. And some emerging economies are doing far more to reduce carbon emissions before 2030 than implied by their NDCs.
“There’s some leeway for some of these developing countries to become more ambitious,” says Kooroshy. “Our sense is that some of them are holding out in negotiation for what they will get in return. And that’s maybe where some of the leeway for these negotiations lies.”
Expect tough negotiations ahead of a high-stakes COP.
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.