Progress is being made towards refining the EU Taxonomy, but perfecting a classification system this complex is an evolving process.
- The recently launched EU Taxonomy User Guide is a valuable step towards overcoming some of the practical difficulties
- It is important to recognise that companies are beginning to disclose their taxonomy alignment data, but the data gap remains wide
- Refining the taxonomy is key to resolving the difficulties asset managers are having in defining sustainable investment
When it comes to the EU taxonomy, the devil is in the data. As a far-reaching classification system for economic activities and reporting that indicates the extent to which companies’ activities benefit or harm the environment, its introduction was never going to be an easy ride.
It’s to be welcomed then that in June the European Commission published not just its European Taxonomy Delegated Act, but also a European Taxonomy User Guide, seeking to tackle some of the practical issues that have arisen. June also saw the European Sustainability Reporting Standards which specify what sustainability data is expected to be reported under Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The EU taxonomy sends a clear signal to the market about the definition of sustainable climate activities of investable assets, the expectation of greater transparency and the importance to minimise the risks of greenwashing. Yet it’s undeniable that investors struggle, among other things, with its lack of compatibility with the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), as well as the data gaps and rigidity.
In our recent webinar, Pictet Asset Management’s Philippe Le Gall, a Senior ESG Engagement Specialist, explained his view. Le Gall highlighted the mismatch between the introduction of the SFDR with its requirements for asset managers and the beginning of corporate reporting under the taxonomy. SFDR was introduced in 2021, two years before Europe’s companies started to disclose data regarding the alignment of their activities with the taxonomy. This is key for asset managers in their own SFDR reporting requirements.
Le Gall is pleased, though, that matters are improving, as in the last few months companies have started to disclose their taxonomy alignments. “When I saw these first data disclosures from companies in a very codified manner, on how their revenues and capex and opex align with the taxonomy, I really sighed with relief,” he says.
Asset managers are struggling to square the taxonomy with the SFDR
Abrdn’s Craig Mackenzie, Head of Sustainability, Multi-Asset and Investment Solutions, has similar concerns. He believes that the regulators set out to make the taxonomy a framework for asset managers complying with the SFDR, but ran into practical difficulties. He points to gaps in the taxonomy’s coverage of activities – for instance it initially only included climate. What’s more, he thinks the European Commission should flexibly accept estimates of taxonomy compliance – rather than insisting companies attest to whether their activities are aligned with the taxonomy.
As a result, Mackenzie says, asset managers are turning to the SFDR’s Article 217 rule for defining sustainable investment, which he regards as too important. “If the EU taxonomy doesn’t work for me, what do I do? I have to make up my own rules and use the article 217 framework. Actually, I use FTSE Russell’s excellent [Green Revenues] taxonomy for qualifying my fund as article 9. But this is not a great outcome because it means every fund in the industry is going to have different ways of calculating sustainable investments.”
Just as with any ambitious, ground-breaking initiative, the EU taxonomy was always likely to encounter challenges. There are signs, though, that as companies start to disclose their alignment with the classification system these problems will gradually recede.
Even so, Lily Dai, our Senior Research Lead at FTSE Russell, an LSEG business, explains there is much to do. She notes that the quality of the early corporate taxonomy reporting is mixed – she may still have to drill down into more detail to discover the extent of their alignment. What’s more, she adds, the taxonomy often relates to EU legislation, making it hard for non-EU companies to report against.
Her conclusion? “I fully agree that disclosure is improving, but we still have a long journey to travel,” she says.
Taxonomy data currently can primarily be used for reporting rather than capital allocation purposes because only a very small number of companies are fully aligned with the EU taxonomy – for instance, analysing data in LSEG’s recently launched enhanced EU Taxonomy Solutions, only about 0.5% of the FTSE All Share Index. What’s more, about a third of the $7 trillion green economy companies are based in emerging markets and so are unlikely to disclose their EU taxonomy alignment.
What are the solutions for accelerating the process of overcoming the taxonomy’s challenges? Le Gall would like to see the European Commission put forward a pragmatic proposal for estimating whether the activities of companies such as those in emerging markets are aligned with the taxonomy.
Mackenzie’s wish list includes interoperability between the world’s 47 different taxonomies and a desire to “think outside the box” when fixing the lack of compatibility between the SFDR and the taxonomy. “The great thing is that the EU has a solution; it has a taxonomy that it is making progress on and learning to fix.”
The fact that so many other jurisdictions have imitated the EU taxonomy shows the wisdom of this initiative. It’s encouraging that the Commission recognises where the problems lie and is working to overcome them. To put this into context, it took decades to get financial accounting right and the taxonomy is on the right path after just three years.
Do you need help navigating the taxonomy?
Navigating the EU taxonomy is proving challenging. Listen to our recent webinar and hear industry experts discussing the structure and complexity of the regulation, implementation and usability challenges and the importance of data and transparency.
Our recently launched enhanced EU Taxonomy data solution combines multiple market leading data sources to analyse eligibility and alignment for companies that are not reporting the data across a broad universe. With the solution, we are helping customers to navigate requirements and fulfil their compliance obligations.
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.
Risk & Compliance